Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg. internet or TV), do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays students can be educated trhough more and more sources. An emerging discussion regarding to this is that teachers are still the main resource providers for students. This essay will present rationales about why in real life, teachers have no longer been the main educators regardless advantages they have.
It is acknowledged that there are certain things that could only be learned from teachers. Firstly, through daily interaction, teachers could play a role modle for students. By being respectful and non-judgemental, teachers could educate students with interpersonal manners and social skills. Moreover, it is the passion that educaotrs have that makes them unique. A enthusiastic and positive attitude towards unknown could be picked up by students.
However, one main reason making me moderately disagree with the statement above is that students actually spend more time online rather than in school. For example, I, as a on-campus university student, only stay in the university for maximum 8 hours a week, which are for lectures and tutorials. The rest of time is allocated to locate online resources, watch movies that will help me on assignments, as well as read textbooks. Therefore, it is impossible for me to complete assignments if I only attend classes but not do self-education.
Furthermore, multi-media, such as games, TV programs and online videos, are more effective in terms of knowledge passing, compared to teachers delivering messages to a big class in the classroom. The study shows that students receive 75% contents when they learn from multi-media sources, while only 40% messages can be learned when it comes to the traditional teacher-student classes. Thus, a significant effectiveness can be found on other educational resources.
In conclusion, some people reckon teachers are still the most important knowledge delivers. Although I acknowledge the uniqueness of teachers, it should be admitted that students are learning more from other creative resources.
- The range and quality of food have changed because of technological and scientific advances. Some people think the range and quality of food have improved, while others think these changes would be harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg. internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays people are living in a "thrown-away" society where they use things for a short time and then throw away. What cause this and what problem it may lead to? 73
- Today many young people change their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 91
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities Do you think it has more advantages than disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
... educaotrs have that makes them unique. A enthusiastic and positive attitude towa...
^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ther than in school. For example, I, as a on-campus university student, only stay...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52427184466 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06292856661 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9102929482 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268775794708 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740838152394 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551637918966 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13691366037 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389602301004 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.