At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays a term of population’s age rate is illustrated a wealthy of one nation. Therefore, countries with a relatively large number of young adults than elder people have which categories of advantages or disadvantages. This essay below will analyze about this issue.
To begin with pointing out several clear benefits of being a country with young rate population, first, there are huge abundant quantities of young workers. In particular, the majority of a wealth country mainly depends on how much many young people it has in working age/ to explain this point, I will indicate the Chinese economic, they lead one of the first world country about manufactured organizations because the enormous number of population in China is attributed such as a storage of manpower. Thereby, Chinese economy briskly soared with a plenty of bills from oversea or domestic trade. Secondly, young aging brings back an innovated potential always full of energy for spellbound creating, facing with tricky challenges and never ever give up. Generally, various workers are a valuable resource for developing all aspects of society and government.
On the other hand, it also has some negative characteristics when being a country with large numbers of young adults. The state of overladen workers will cause non-employed or enormous underemployed people. As a result, young people can easily be tempted by various social maladies such as HIV, heroin and so forth because of their earlier curious age and weak perception. Furthermore, to solving this problem the government need to strictly control with accurate policies and welfares to arrange apt place for workers to deter society from perplexing.
In conclusion, every problems always exist two opposite side that we might perceive about that. Personally, I think young rate population supplies more meaningful benefits than detrimental things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Lucre96 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Lauriel | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | green1222 | 89 | view |
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 56
- 4 fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngful benefits than detrimental things.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4406779661 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90784237134 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664406779661 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9300147887 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221566460217 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715507264524 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722337273814 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130731898771 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585994640053 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.