Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
People differ greatly in their views whether governmental financial assistance for children’s education should be promoted. While this trend is advantagenous in some aspects, I would contend that the benefits are more significant.
There are two compelling reasons why providing finacial support for children’s education exerts some adverse effects on society. First and foremost, when students do not have to pay the education cost, they could not try to get high academic achievement. These students, as a consequence, may become unprofessional people for community in the future. Furthermore, the allocating budget of government to children’s education can lead to an increase in the rate of illegal immigrations which can creates an ongoing security threat in the country. To explain, providing children with a great education system without any expenditures on education is attractive to numerous parents in third-world countries, which may results in the trend of traveling to nations producing this policy.
However, I am convinced that there are more benefits to invest money in children’s education. The primary reason is that this activity may creats the fairness of studying in community. An exellent explaination is that students from all financial backgrounds may have equal access to education. Another reason why the government should pay the costs for children’s education is that the financial support of the government can be conductive to the economic development of family. This is because parents are relieved from the burden of spending money on children’s education. The single parents, for example, can give their children an opportnity to study in a good education environment although they can not be rich people.
To sum up, although the payment cost of the government to children’s education is unbenefical in few aspects, including losing students’ motivation for learning, I am of the opinion that this action is associated with many advantages, such as equal education opportunities for pupils from all fiancial conditions
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | Maanpreet | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | truognchinh | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | truognchinh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 29
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is better for college students to live in school than to live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 72
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts on society. First and foremost, when students do not have to pay the educatio...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefical in few aspects, including losing students' motivation for learning, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, third, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66349206349 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35362531018 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3636432424 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259158484506 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878143737514 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537961867997 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163390667171 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331300470279 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.