The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that journalists are delving more into issues and emergencies without writing about positive changes. As a result, society in general and individuals, in particular, are falling victim to this tendency. I completely agree with this view.
There are two main reasons why reports, for the time being, are full of problems and emergencies. Firstly, news about positive changes such as the change of the kilogram is probably less attention-grabbing for people to some extent. Furthermore, people often pay more attention to the up-to-date information that is close to their lives and the people they care about. For example, a number of my friends have idolized group dances in Korea, so if the events or information are involved in their idols, they would certainly read those articles. Secondly, as people are concerned about this news, journalists have to write more to attract people’s concern to maximize their profits. As a consequence, this tendency is continuing to exist.
This tendency is harmful to society and individuals for sure. In terms of individual, many people, especially the young, lack the knowledge of developments in the world. The information would probably be useful to their careers, their future so if they do not arm this knowledge, they would have a hard time meeting employers’ demands. In terms of society, general knowledge would be affected. If governments do not adopt the policies that solve this problem, a lack of qualified employees would increase and there would be a repercussion in the country’s economy.
In conclusion, I believe that the tendency of journalism has a negative effect on society, especially the young, the future of countries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-01 | Mollymaul | 92 | view |
2023-05-11 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
2021-01-21 | yash0724 | 75 | view |
2021-01-02 | gaurav2492 | 73 | view |
2020-09-06 | Grammerly Premium | 92 | view |
- Many people think that governments should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. Some others think that there are important priorities (eg.cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27472527473 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07926824983 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0661119481 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146888183245 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530914862152 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490586919914 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814392241262 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298689767869 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.