Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Keeping the employee's conversations with outside world controlled and effective should be the main goal of management. Some misconduct, misbehaviour or use of informal and abusive words can be the cause of a lawsuit filed against company. I agree with the statement that for some cases, it is necessary to conduct routine monitoring, but not for all employees. As the company's working environment and heirarchy is similar to that of any democratic govenment, there are some departments which shold allow email-corresopondence without constraints.
The employees, working with the department of customer relation or complains and services, should be monitored by management. This are the departmens which uses the email more frequently then any other departments. It is vital to maintain consumer trust, a slight misconduct or misbehaviour, might term in to a lawsuit or defamed reputation of company.
Moreover, the conversations related the services and complaints, are not require entire chat to be stored once the issue has been solved. If there is a way to store just the important information like what was the issue, who and when solved it, is enough to stay protected in any future altercation with customer. Using just the epitome of information only require tenth part of total conversation and save a lot of money, time and space. In addition, it is easy to scroll through this kind of aggregated information for statistics and searching particular case, as it gives a standardise format.
However, some department of company operate in shadows, like government realtions, the department which operate with the holdings of company, the department related to the policies of the company, the risk mitigation department. These department requires some anonymity to operate properly, for instance, consider that the company is moving towards bankrupssy, and comapny has no resouces to prevent that in near time, so the risk mitigation department comes up with a plan of getting a loan for 1 year, and by that time company will be again out of trouble. If that information will be known by other employees, how will they react, will they stay in the job for 1 year, there will be chaos.
In a nutshell, monitoring the e-mail correspondence of empoloyee is good practice as far as private information is not concern, because it will be violation of personal rights. However, there should be some freedom given to departments, which are require to operate in anonymity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. 66
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 41
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[3]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ces, should be monitored by management. This are the departmens which uses the email...
^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...ed the services and complaints, are not require entire chat to be stored once the issue...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... searching particular case, as it gives a standardise format. However, some department of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this department' or 'These departments'?
Suggestion: This department; These departments
...ompany, the risk mitigation department. These department requires some anonymity to operate prop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...freedom given to departments, which are require to operate in anonymity.
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'operating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: operating
...given to departments, which are require to operate in anonymity.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2305764411 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11255997497 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6898083874 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4375 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127110471031 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039840522252 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358176028021 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069830637597 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308487381265 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.