The bar graph illustrates the difference between males and females about trip decisions.
In general, it is evident that both men and women have a tendency to travel for working while the opposite is true for day trip. In addition, the biggest differences in the number males travelling for working and day trip.
As can be seen from the chart, the number of males who travel for working is highest, with 35000. This figure is higher than the quantity of females travelling for working, by 5000. The figure for male travellers who travel to learn other cultures stand at 15000 while the figure for female ones is just over 10000. Similarly, 10000 mens travelling for day trip are higher than 8000 females who have the same reason.
Meanwhile, standing at 25000, the number of women travelling for shopping is higher than that of men, with somewhere in the vicinity of 29000. The figure for males and females who travel because of scenery is relatively similar, hovering at over 25000. For family and friends purpose, roughly 2000 male travelers choose this reason while the figure for females is exactly 25000.
- Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational; otherwise they are complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Government should change the way individuals live while others believe they should choose the way themselves. Discuss these both points of view and give your opinion. 73
- IELTS writing task 1 the recycling process of plastics 60
- The diagrams below show information about the number of UK university students and the government spending on each university studentSummaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed. However, some people think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34173462639 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6814633602 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112918924038 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635699154546 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575654073378 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982964163876 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454052773796 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.