Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems. To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement?
For past generations, it has been an enigmatic quandary as to how we can prevent illness and diseases. However, it is evident that governments should deal with issues such as reducing environmental pollution and housing problem. Although history and literature are replete with countless examples, the scope and breadth of the greed of human is a paragon that reverberates such a view.
To begin with, the greed of human depicts the matter pertaining to this theme. In modern society compared with the past, people have dramatically thriven much better life due to the Industrial Revolution. Many convenient facilities and large infrastructures have been built to increase human happiness. However, sadly though, ceaseless constructions of those buildings make irrevocable devastation on the environment and housing problem with an increase in the cost of living. This greed of human has made pathological illness and detrimental diseases by themselves. Thus, noted in the case of the greed of human, one can lucidly ascertain an epitome why governments should do something to prevent the environmental problem and social issues.
To remedy already dilapidated environment, the government should use the public commercials and propaganda specifically designed to the recycling, a ripple effect which would bring substantially positive impacts on eco-system. This is a long-run strategy, enough to reinvigorate already dead environment. Also, for housing problem, the government should do something more than just decentralizing the city. Over-population, caused various issues such as housing problem, the cost of living, have been caused by concentration in the city. Dispersing the city's convenience such as facilities and infrastructures into other provinces would make people move countryside and town and would resolve this over-population. These governmental interventions would obviously prevent illness and diseases for everyone.
At first glance, it may seem like the governments do not need any actions to prevent illness and diseases, but the examples of the greed of human coherently prove that the governments should take to tackle to dwindle environmental and social problems such as environmental pollution and housing problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | abid1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | abid1 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Luisjackiet | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | dhuy | 73 | view |
- People think that it’s too late to do anything, while others believe actions can be taken to improve the situations. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business distrcit. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 73
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems. To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72835820896 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26175923242 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558208955224 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1576284176 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9375 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259214826474 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852715420266 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609047768823 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172420110312 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172609212406 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.