It is true that in future being bilingual will help in the growth of career prospects. Whether children should start learning a new language in kindergarten or in secondary school is a never - ending debate. In my opinion, a child should begin learning a foreign lingo in primary school as they are benign.
On one hand, some people believe that secondary school children are mature enough to opt language they want to learn. This is because of their adaptation to the world has developed, however, in some scenarios it has been observed that rather than learning a new dialect child would prefer to learn other skills. Consequently, they come under high pressure from public schools to learn the language as a core subject. Thus, I believe that instead of pressuring them to learn a language as vernacular basic familiarization should be provided without any formal assessments.
On the other hand, others feel that children are benign and have the potential to learn a new language and inculcate multiple skills at the same time. The reason for this is that children at this age have high observation power and they progressively adapt and grasp to whatever being taught. For example, researches by the catalyst and other methods have shown conclusively that child from birth till they complete primary school can learn a new lingo similar to their mother tongue, whereas, this ability gradually decreases with time.
To conclude, although the choice of language to learn should be of that child, but I believe adopting a new language as a proficient user could only be possible if started from avery early stage of school.
It is true that in future being bilingual will help in the growth of career prospects. Whether children should start learning a new language in kindergarten or in secondary school is a never-ending debate. In my opinion, a child should begin learning a foreign lingo in primary school as they are benign.
On one hand, some people believe that secondary school children are mature enough to opt language they want to learn. This is because of their adaptation to the world has developed, however, in some scenarios it has been observed that rather than learning a new dialect child would prefer to learn other skills. Consequently, they come under high pressure from public schools to learn the language as a core subject. Thus, I believe that instead of pressuring them to learn a language as vernacular basic familiarization should be provided without any formal assessments.
On the other hand, others feel that children are benign and have the potential to learn a new language and inculcate multiple skills at the same time. The reason for this is that children at this age have high observation power and they progressively adapt and grasp to whatever being taught. For example, researches by the catalyst and other methods have shown conclusively that child from birth till they complete primary school can learn a new lingo similar to their mother tongue, whereas, this ability gradually decreases with time.
To conclude, although the choice of language to learn should be of that child, but I believe adopting a new language as a proficient user could only be possible if started from a very early stage of school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-03 | NAVNEET BALI | 67 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give r 78
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society? 73
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centres, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What are benefits of protecting places for natural beauty spots? How can it be solved? 93
- v 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01470588235 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6800134115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4904079049 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516281589031 0.244688304435 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217325124428 0.084324248473 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164213434832 0.0667982634062 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376600089225 0.151304729494 249% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.290604082528 0.056905535591 511% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.