The bar chart below The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000.
Summarise the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented bar chart illustrates the proportion occupied by one-person households in 5 distinct age groups in the US between 1850 and 2000.
Generally, it is evident that the trend towards living alone raised its popularity among all groups over the period. In addition, despite having undergone different levels of increment, 55-64 remained the group having most numerous one-person households in all marked years.
Turning into detail, in 1850, with nearly 3%, people aging 55-64 had the highest proportion of one-person household, followed the same over-2-per-cent figures of 37-46 and 47-54 group. However, the latter’s number grew mildly in 1900, marginally edging out that of the former, but still ranked second due to a growth to about 4% of 55-64 group. Meanwhile, in the first year its data was collected, 27-36 group had the least rate of people living alone, with only over 2%.
Regarding to the remainder of the period, it was not until 1950 did the figure relating to people aging 17-26 become available. Specifically, starting at 2% in 1950, it grew considerably to nearly 5% in 2000. Likewise, upward trends were also witnessed in 47-54 and 55-64 group, with significant growths to above 12% and 16% in 2000, respectively. Although the figure for people aging 37-46 maintained its increase, it was surpassed by that of 27-36 group as the third largest number among 5 groups, with 8%.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays, sport is becoming a big business with high earning for professional sportsmen and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways.Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- This table shows the percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...largest number among 5 groups, with 8%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, regarding, second, so, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1652173913 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74059312223 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8323552722 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17725646908 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731111427046 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646007360388 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128314669423 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758439709095 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.