In recent a few decades, there has been a widespread debate on whether keeping away from others is better for the relationship or not. Personally, I believe that visiting the relates occasionally with staying away is better. I feel this way for three main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The more people interact with each other, the more the problems increase. Therefore, it is better for people to come and go. Also, keeping touch often is better, so the relationship does not end. My own experience is a good compelling example. I am from Saudi Arabia and last year, I started to study abroad in the United States. I was staying away almost from everybody that I have relation with. However, I regularly speak with my family and close friends by phone. This keeps my relationship strong even though I live away. On the contrary, when I was in Saudi Arabia, I see my family every day because I live with them. As a result, almost every week I have an issue with my sister. Therefore, I have realized that living away from family and friends are much better, because they tend to miss the good things about you.
In addition to interaction, staying away from relatives keeps the meeting interesting. In other words, when I meet my friend every day, I will talk about everything in my life. Consequently, we will discuss things that are not related to our relationship such as politics. This will increase the tension between us because of the controversy. Seeing my friend, on the other hand, every week will lead to talk only about what he or she missed (The positive information) eventually the meeting will end by talking only about ourselves.
Frankly speaking, sometimes staying away from relatives create also some issues such as why he or she does not call me and that time? So, people need to understand who they need to talk with more often and whom they do not. This will create a healthy relationship with all. For instance, I talk to my parents every week and with my friends every other day. My wife talks to her parents every three days and with her friends every two weeks. So, it depends on the person.
Finally, I strongly believe that being away from relatives is much better. This is mainly because it decreases the problems, and it keeps the meeting positively.
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 73
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 85
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad multi 85
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 60
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, frankly, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70443349754 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52594583063 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.185845793 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7407407407 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.037037037 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40740740741 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270576401182 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079300771857 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521649023706 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160263130417 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348944481826 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.