Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or
formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons and/or your personal experience.
Recently, the importance of life experience in effectively teach people has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it better to learn by books or school educations?". Whereas it is a widely held view that life experience is a good teacher, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, life experiences are bound up inextricably with social developments, which indicates they lead to both books and school educations. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrate the relationship between lifestyle and childhood as well as an exponential increase in adulthood. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of life experiences correlated positively with not only books but also school educations and teachers.
Within the realm of social science, without the slightest doubt, efficient teaching systems attribute to life experiences and school educations, in that it would come down to universities, societies, and families. A salient example of such attribution is a livelihood, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take habits for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint individuals' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of school educations.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the importance of life experiences in teaching people should not be ignored. However, we perceive that, with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-17 | reza_irani | 85 | view |
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – thatwe should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 88
- A cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. Howrealistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 85
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. Howrealistic do you think it is ? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 85
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city.'Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportationavailable for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or expe 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61732851986 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2792503774 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.849121284 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238559087538 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759888055984 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643842684382 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135381535555 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047223942473 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.