These days, people have made great progress in the realm of agriculture. However, many people still have difficulty getting enough food because of some worldwide problems and we should tackle them for all humans’ well-being.
There are many reasons why some people still suffer from starving in the age of technology. Firstly, many technical problems slow down the spread of new scientific work, as a result, we do not produce enough food. As farmers may come across with may problems that scientists do not expect before like the drought or climate changes, we need to wait for a long time until those advanced methods of culturing which can make crop productive in laboratory successfully are applied in every farm and provide more food for us. Also, social problems like poverty and waste of food are more complex. The richer waste so much food while many poor people could not afford the cheapest food. It is shock that every day a kitchen in top restaurant in Shanghai drops food that could support a family for a whole week.
In order to solve the starving problems, governments and citizens could do many things. Governments could donate more money to biologists and encourage them to accelerate their study on crops and livestock. Also, governments could put a heavy tax on luxury restaurants as their kitchens always abandon too much edible but not fresh food for good taste. We citizens could contribute to this campaign of stopping hungry too. For example, we could do many charities to share food with people in need in our city and raise money on the Internet to anyone who goes hungry.
All in all, many factors lead to starve and we are supposed to tackle it.
- in spite of advanced made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 73
- in spite of advanced made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...while many poor people could not afford even the cheapest food. It is shock that eve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ven the cheapest food. It is shock that everyday a kitchen in top restaurant in Shanghai...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ry. All in all, many factors lead to the starve and we are supposed to tackle it.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87197231834 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46967212814 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1663600644 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147628150255 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554435618966 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426979499817 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867074119988 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419138544693 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.