An alarming number of medical and teaching practitioners tend to work in well developed countries leaving their own needy country. This essay will enlist a few causes regarding this trend, following a logical solution to deal with this condition.
Main reason for this issue is lack of opportunity. Some countries generate more doctors as well as teachers than the market demand, this leads to most of the professionals becoming jobless right after graduating collage. For example, government operated hospitals only need a couple of doctors per field of expertise, though the number of patients increase, but due to the government lack of funding, doctors are obliged to do a 2 mans work. Another source of this problem is salary. Most poor countries offer low professional fees to doctors and teachers. This poses a significant stimulation to this people to find work abroad, since most of what they earn are not enough to cater the need of their family.
Problems like this are serious and need immediate action. One solution perhaps the most effective is to offer more jobs to these professionals. Day and night job shifting for doctors and creating schools to rural areas for teachers will somehow mitigate this issue. Teachers are the pillar of the society, they are the one who is responsible of building the next generations mindset which eventually will be the one to lead the nation. Moreover, doctors played significant role in the community to prevent and cure sickness. Both jobs are one of the vital contributors for country development. Thus, a law should be passed stating that doctors and teachers must serve their own country for ample amount of years before allowing them to work in other countries, this will ensure that this people will help their fellow countrymen first before serving other country needs.
To conclude, while job opportunity and poor salary are the main cause why doctors and teachers are leaving the country. I do believe that generating more jobs and implementing laws to help and prevent practitioners to work abroad will eradicate this problem.
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales and their products. What are those methods? Which is the most effective method? 84
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give advantage for both and your point of view. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...This poses a significant stimulation to this people to find work abroad, since most ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...who is responsible of building the next generations mindset which eventually will be the on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... other countries, this will ensure that this people will help their fellow countryme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 343.0 242.827586207 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1166180758 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67899413574 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556851311953 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8119228885 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.235294118 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334593638726 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102786719905 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643514264198 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216604636981 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832881916762 0.0609392437508 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.