Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art wy using a computer. Agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that arm-chair tourism has gain popularity recently. However, I totally dissent from the notion that public museums and art galleries will no longer be needed because of some major reasons which will be analyzed in this essay.
There is an increasing trend of arm-chair tourism as individuals can easily explore historical objects and works of art, just by a click on internet-based devices. But, we can not deny that the feeling when watching it in TV is significantly differ from the real experience in your own eyes and hands. It likes the distinction between seeing an image of durian and eating it, savoring its delicious taste in your mouth. Another reason in favor of the remaining exist of public museums and art galleries is that it could bring a heaps of benefits for visitors in terms of health and relationship. To be more precise, it is often to take a trip to museums or art galleries with friends or family, thus, it would be definitely a good chance to broaden their horizons and build bonds with beloved ones. Moreover, a short walk around the place could be considered as an exercise to improve their physical health, which is more beneficial than a passive activity, like strolling the mouse with pictures.
At certain times, seeing historical objects and works of art by using a computer could be worthwhile if we temporarily can not go to real places. It could be the problem regarding expenses or geography distance. But, for sure, after watching these on TV programmes, the momentum to explore it in reality will be reinforced. It is proved by the increasing numbers of visitors to public museums and art galleries year after year. Therefore, if having appropriate conditions, individual should discover historical attractions and art galleries in their own experience.
In conclusion, arm-chair tourism has become popularity but the need of public museums and art galleries still is there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-22 | Thuan Hoang | 78 | view |
- In the future, it seems it will be more diffilcult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 84
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as the family roles. What are the changes which have occured? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community. Write a letter to the newspaper editor, say-suggest someone you think should receive the award- describe what the person does to help the community- suggest an award that 89
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art wy using a computer. Agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...when watching it in TV is significantly differ from the real experience in your own ey...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a heap' or simply 'heaps'?
Suggestion: a heap; heaps
...nd art galleries is that it could bring a heaps of benefits for visitors in terms of he...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00931677019 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82676430351 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1047070148 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352202107485 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113040129372 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088012548499 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229437059543 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418520649134 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.