In the future, it seems it will be more diffilcult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is predicted that sustaining on the Earth will be more difficult in the following decades. While I totally consent to the first statement, I believe that investing a huge amount of money on space exploration could not be the worthwhile resolution and funds should be allocated on more practical remedies.
There are some major reasons why human is confronting with difficulties to survive on the Earth. One is the uncontrolled consumption of natural resources that lead to depletion as a result. It is no doubt that the extraction of fossil fuels, such as gas, coal and oil to serve personal and industrial demands make it run out. Second, the rising level of pollution worldwide, of the land, the oceans and the air pose serious threats on human life. Take Vietnam as an illustration, million tons of industrial rubbish are illegally released into the environment, killing the aquatic life and contaminating drinking water. All factors above are considered as alarming issues threatening the survival of human on the Earth.
However, I am behind the idea that allocating a vast amount of money on space exploration to settle outer space could be a waste of valuable resources due to no guarantee of success. At present, money should be used to fund healthcare services globally and to offer better education for all people. Moreover, governments and authorities should concentrate on developing advanced technologies which are more environmentally friendly and finding renewable resources to satisfy the demanding energy. For example, in the field of transport, vehicles using hydrogen or waste cooking oil are highly appreciated initiatives, which are being applied in some firms like Mc Donald’s company. These practical solutions would contribute significantly to save the Earth, and enhance the sustainable environment for human life.
In conclusion, I agree that it is more and more difficult for next generations sustaining on the Earth but expenditure on researching other planets to settle outer space should be low priority at present time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | Evelyn_Han | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | linhrj35 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Bhimani Nikunj | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | Thuan Hoang | 84 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art wy using a computer. Agree or disagree? 78
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as the family roles. What are the changes which have occured? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- In the future, it seems it will be more diffilcult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- You recently received furniture that was already damaged at the time of arrival Write a letter to the manager of shipping company about it and say What furniture did you order What was the damage Suggest what needs to be done about it 96
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community. Write a letter to the newspaper editor, say-suggest someone you think should receive the award- describe what the person does to help the community- suggest an award that 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... life. Take Vietnam as an illustration, million tons of industrial rubbish are illegall...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30581039755 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05954094679 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599388379205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1148778643 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237362377885 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746150552783 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762448588244 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164583519361 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849115647134 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.