It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend?
Nowadays, family members are not as close as they were before. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty as to the causes of the problem, and how it might be resolved. In this essay, I will examine the issue and seek some possible solutions.
To begin with, in regard to causes, it is undeniable that better job opportunities in big cities lead to the fact that young generation wold rather live alone than live with their parents. For instance, in many rural areas in China, when old people are ill on the bed while their children that work in big cities are too far to take care of them. In addition, different education makes family members hard to understand each other as different ages may tend to have totally different opinions towards a same thing. To be specific, old people usually hold traditional thinking which is taught when they were young but young people tend to be more open-minded and more affected by the internet compared with the stubborn old one.
On the other hand, as to solution, the government should draw up and enact harsh laws to improve the job market in the countryside where the economics development is comparatively slow so that the young generations from these areas could land good jobs in their hometown, living with their parents. Furthermore, the government ought to encourage the schools to introduce more knowledge about old tradition to the students so that students could have more common topics with their parents and they can understand each other better.
To summarise, there is no doubt that better working environment in huge cities and different learing background would make people far away with their families. At the same time, however, the government carries out policy that help rural countryside increase job opportunities and make schools to add knowledge to students are efficient fashions to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | pqh2612002 | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree? 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, no doubt, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9746835443 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60427464659 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0295451025 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105462016745 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494608012232 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485843645999 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784483315963 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775470660704 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.