The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The proportion of people in the USA showing how usually they ate at fast food restaurants in 2003, 2006 and 2013 is depicted by the given graph.
Overall, a significant number of people went to restaurants once a week and once or twice a month. Almost equal proportion of inhabitants of USA preferred going out several times a week or a few times a year. However, very few ate fast food everyday or never.
More specifically, almost equal number of people that is 30% went out once or twice a month and once a week in 2003. This proportion relentlessly dropped to 4 to 5% who either ate fast food everyday or never. Whilst 20% individuals visited a restaurant several times a week in 2006, only 16% of them did so on 2003 and 2013. Comparatively, just a meagre percentage of people which is 3 to 5% had outside food everyday or never.
To sum up, a large sum of individuals went out once a week and once or twice a month compared to every day or never to ate fast food in the given years.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both the views and give 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...a year. However, very few ate fast food everyday or never. More specifically, almost ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ver, very few ate fast food everyday or never. More specifically, almost equal num...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ped to 4 to 5% who either ate fast food everyday or never. Whilst 20% individuals visite...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...5% who either ate fast food everyday or never. Whilst 20% individuals visited a resta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...eople which is 3 to 5% had outside food everyday or never. To sum up, a large sum of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...is 3 to 5% had outside food everyday or never. To sum up, a large sum of individua...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to everyday'?
Suggestion: to everyday
...week and once or twice a month compared to every day or never to ate fast food in the given ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36559139785 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65906825882 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1508283324 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297271807244 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138723348534 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121112389681 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226211133986 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143829937293 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.