The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The proportion of people aged 65 and above between 1940 and 2040 in Japan, Sweden and USA is shown by the given line graph.
Overall, the statistics illustrated a rising trend starting from 1940 to 2000 which will continue till 2040. The percentage of older people increased in the USA and Sweden following a fluctuating trend. However, in Japan it declined till the year 1980 before it surged. Over the century (1940 to 2040) the proportion is predicted to hike in all the countries.
More specifically, the percentage of elder people started at around 5% and 9% in USA and Sweden respectively. It then experienced a gradual rise before meeting at 14% for both of the countries in the year 1990. Whilst the proportion will be plateaued in the USA, it will rise significantly by 6% before receding to 19% in Sweden in 2020. In the year 2040, the number of aged people will increase to about 25% in Sweden and to 24% in USA. Comparatively, the data was a meagre that is 5% in 1940 in Japan. Then it decreased slowly before reaching a peak of 27% in 2040.
To sum up, the proportion of people aged 65 and above expanded in the given time period and will follow a same trend in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a town called islip as it is now, and plans for its development 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 11
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52777777778 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63859647503 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7394664259 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225751174291 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899071702342 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110306600784 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175003008427 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991286656395 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.