Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in following roles models such as sports stars and film stars. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that successful role models not only boost motivation of individuals, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned trend is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follow such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, perseverance and dedication. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of supporting successful people in life.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of supporting glamorous film stars and sports stars as role models are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Dilpreet singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Majheal Singh | 77 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 77
- Nowadays large shopping malls are taking over small businesses and local shops? Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 82
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 77
- Many universities deduct marks of students’ who submit late assignments. Please recommend and action to taken to solve this problem. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91358024691 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75809211098 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8603339964 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.545454545 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186861255482 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699836857107 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108539078405 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142323369745 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128898908147 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.