Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Undoubtedly, spending abundant money on exploring space might be a waste of money for the government because it might be a long term investment. However, there are some benefits for the government to do that, which reasons will be illustrated as follows.
Initially, funding space travel or space exploration have benefits on the income of the government. For one hand, investing in space travel will be a vast of income on traveling in the future. To be specific, nowadays people are likely to spend money on traveling abroad, which means people prefer to enjoying these kinds of entertainment during their free time. In this way, in the next few years, as long as the space travel has been matural, people will keen on try the new things and will have a vast income and tax for the government. On the other hand, to invest in space exploration will have a back income on resources. In specific words, there are plenty of resources in the space, like solar energy, nuclear energy etc.. once the government explores these new energies to replace the expensive resources on the earth, it will save plenty of money and reduce the pollution for the environment. What's more, in a long run, the government will save a lot of fund on clean the pollutions. only in this respect, the government can have plenty of income once they spend money on space travel and exploration.
What's more, to fund space travel or space exploration have advantages on the government's reputation. that is to say, a government spends money on exploration of the space can show a strong background of science technology, which is the benefit for a government to attest its influence on the international. if a government have a strong background on space exploration, it will improve its reputation in the world a lot. take America for an example, the exploration of the space is the most famous in the world not only from the government but also from some private company, which won a fanbulance reputation for the country. if a government have sick development on the space, people will think the government is low development. take the North Korea for an example, which seldom have exploration on space show that the country has low economic development and low reputations. Hence, a fund in space exploration can win a good reputation for a government.
In a nutshell, due to my life experiments, my spirit, and my thinks, I could agree more with that there are some benefits for the government to fund space travel and space exploration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | ReihanehM | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | wenbxh | 60 | view |
| 2018-09-26 | pershin_sh | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | goharzay.m | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 60
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 3
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enjoy'?
Suggestion: enjoy
...ng abroad, which means people prefer to enjoying these kinds of entertainment during the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e, like solar energy, nuclear energy etc.. once the government explores these new ...
^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Once
...like solar energy, nuclear energy etc.. once the government explores these new energ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 904, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...duce the pollution for the environment. Whats more, in a long run, the government wil...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 995, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
... a lot of fund on clean the pollutions. only in this respect, the government can hav...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ney on space travel and exploration. Whats more, to fund space travel or space exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...pace exploration have advantages on the governments reputation. that is to say, a governmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...vantages on the governments reputation. that is to say, a government spends money on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on exploration of the space can show a strong background of science technology,...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...est its influence on the international. if a government have a strong background o...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...rove its reputation in the world a lot. take America for an example, the exploration...
^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... fanbulance reputation for the country. if a government have sick development on t...
^^
Line 5, column 734, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...hink the government is low development. take the North Korea for an example, which s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 8.0752688172 483% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85846867749 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86184150307 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417633410673 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9808414126 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.210526316 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322640668582 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129723700744 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587871107612 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222162222215 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272382819794 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.