medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the physical health is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the medical knowledge can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the human's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the mental health, as well as the health life cycle, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the normal life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the lifestyle and the life experience apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a healthy lifestyle might increase the consequences of medical improvements. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the medical science could relate to this reality that the demerits of chronic diseases pertain to a brain tumour. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the period of treatment is correlated negatively with new medical surgery. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the comfortable life.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of human health far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the better condition of life prove the significance of the herbal medicine, but also pinpoint decreasing the number of serious illnesses implications.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 manraj123 55 view
2020-01-28 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-27 manraj123 85 view
2020-01-27 manraj123 77 view
2020-01-19 saeidazizi 88 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...s essay. From a social standpoint, the humans life can provide the society with some ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42066420664 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11083023374 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6060013123 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142890329363 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442115166859 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261271860701 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766216355471 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00688928929696 0.0609392437508 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.