Some people suggest that there should be restrictions on a detailed description of crimes in the newspapers and on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about a detailed description of crimes in mass media. In my opinion, I stand by the idea that a detailed description of crimes, especially violent crime, should be restricted.
First and foremost, It can not deny that this information influences badly to children, who lack knowledge and awareness. They are so vulnerable and immature that they cannot judge whether the activities performed in mass media are right or not. So, viewing some violent behavior in a movie or on television makes them try to reproduce that situation in real life and commit crimes. Furthermore, an excessive content of violence arouses people's aggressiveness. Consequently, they believe things can be solved by violence and utilize it as an approach to deal with conflicts in the real world.
Secondly, describing criminal too detail are similar to teaching would-be crime how to deal with in a similar case in the future. Although the original purpose of criminal describe is to help viewers have a deep-rooted understanding of the criminal underworld and teach them how to resolve problems while unfortunately being in these hazardous situations, TV programme producers are likely to go into detail as much as possible in crime reports. Some of them can go so far as to present the whole procedure for a law-offending practice. Not surprisingly, those reports turn out to be free courses from which prospective criminals can learn the sophisticated technique to carry out their brutal crimes. Those instead make a significant contribution to the rise in crime rates in the whole society.
In conclusion, media violence, including the detailed picturing of the criminal has a bad influence on society. Therefore, the government should impose constraints on detailed descriptions of offense reports so as to minimize opportunities for criminals to learn tricks and minimize the drawback of this kind of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | nguyentranvn | 84 | view |
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 89
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Do you think it is better to send criminals to jail or let them receive education or job training 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y violent crime, should be restricted. First and foremost, It can not deny that...
^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the whole society. In conclusion, media violence, including the detailed p...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...etailed descriptions of offense reports so as to minimize opportunities for criminals to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31045751634 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11777893968 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9140540904 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177548958757 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630554583864 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595039695836 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123933806336 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825970366318 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.