Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout the history of mankind, more and more money is poured into space science. While I am of the opinion that the needs of humanity should always come first, I still believe that the value of space research is worth the cost.
From my point of view, humanity is always the number one priority as well as keeping the human race alive is a necessity. Alternatively, space exploration is no more than a desire. If we put our desires before our needs, then everyone loses out on a better standard of living. As an illustration, thousands of people in Africa are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and even drinkable water. Even more, a million deaths are caused by cancer, diseases and poor healthcare quality. Money, therefore, should be spent on feeding the starving millions around the globe, helping the locals climb higher in social ladder and generally making life down here better before looking up into the heavens.
On the other hand, we cannot deny the fact that space science could bring real benefits to humanity in long-term run. We all know that life on Earth doesn’t last forever and scientist always in the quest for a new homeland suitable for the people’ resettlement in the future. Moreover, humans are also struggling with the natural resource scarcity such as rare metals and oil along with the energy shortage, which might be found outside the “Known World”. For this reason, space exploration could be the viable solution for overpopulation and natural resources crisis.
In inclusion, although the mission to improve living standard is the first priority, it is an undeniable fact that space science is the matter of vital importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | Luna Qian | 51 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Ssssslth | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | nguyentranvn | 92 | view |
| 2017-04-07 | kingnight153 | 98 | view |
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 78
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...le in Africa are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and even drinkable water. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty. Money, therefore, should be spent on feeding the starving millions around the...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...solution for overpopulation and natural resources crisis. In inclusion, although the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04593639576 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68288415191 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636042402827 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0018576728 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174107295413 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517783324352 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037744959398 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100063187927 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229177587471 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.