Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that people have different views in terms of the rold of space exploration when a great deal of money have been investing in this sector. In my opinion, while I agree that enhancing living standards of ordinary people is the top priority of the government, I believe that space research is equally important.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why pouring money into improving standards of living of inhabitants is far more pivotal. Firstly, it is true that many regions on Earth are enduring economical deprivation, which deserve immediate government funding. To illustrate, thoundsands of people in Africa, a country which is infamous for poverty, are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and even drinkable water. Money, therefore, could be diverted to this region to eluminate poverty and help the locals climb higher in social ladder instead of squandering on space programs. Besides, subsidizing educational facilities and quality could also be vital and desperately need investment from governments themself. Without investing heavily in such area, literacy and numeracy rate could decrease in the foreseeable future, not to mention national economy could also be in recession in the long run.
On the other hand, I believe that space research could benefit inhabitants as well to some extent seeing that i might help deal with overpopulation and natural resources crisis. It stands to reason that we human beings have been facing unprecedented overpopulation in many recent decades, which is a headache for governments. Conducting uniiversal travels could, therefore, bring a solution if austronauts could find other non-earth planets that accommodate the huge number of residents all over the world. Humans are also encountering the crisis with regard to natural recources scarcity such as rare metals and oil, which might abound in other planets. If, for example, these planets could be sought out, then it is highly likely that World Wars for the purpose of oil could no long exist.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although the mission to improve living standards of ordinary people is greatly important, the investment in space travel could also merit consideration.
- The diagram shows the information in the genetic engineering process. 56
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent? 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they by punished 39
- The table shows the maximum, minimum, and average monthly salaries in a European country in five employment sector in 2009, 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...for poverty, are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and even drinkable water. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ants as well to some extent seeing that i might help deal with overpopulation and...
^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...lp deal with overpopulation and natural resources crisis. It stands to reason that we hum...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29661016949 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85554658833 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590395480226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.3771831183 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165684495395 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591709406222 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505321381492 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11782822134 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422866437132 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.