The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The given pie charts depict data about how fish import to the US was changed and the table illustrates its in Billions of Dollars in the years 1988, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, at the beginning of the period China imported the least amount of fish to the US, while Canada was the most significant sector. In comparison, at the middle and at the end of the period such sectors as others and China became the largest segments.
Looking at the details, it must be said that other countries’ sectors accounted for 27 per cent in 1988, and experienced an increase to more than two-fifth in 1992. As for China, this segment made up less than a fifth, and rose to 20 %. After that, it had a growth of one in ten per cent in 2000. Total price started at 6.57 billion dollars, and increased to 8.52 in 1992. At the end of the period, it had a growth to 2.2 billion dollars.
By contrast, the third sector of others decreased by 4 % in 2000. In 1988 Canadian rate were at 60 % and then it fell to 34 %. After that, this segment went down to less than a third fraction in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | jenmin | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Szprawstyle | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Sandhu111 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | Sidhulakhveer17@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Some young people are leaving countryside to live in cities and towns leaving only old people in countryside What are the problems of this issue What can be done to solve this problem 47
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
- Today more and more people choose ready to eat food rather than cooking themselves. Do this development have more advantages over disadvantages? 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the inforamtion by selectiong and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31343283582 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36106631553 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5965841498 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8181818182 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177383342534 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647609580971 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934442593499 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132956438782 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122794919672 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.