The table shows the amount of money give in aid technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
The table give information about how much money was given in technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and the rest of the world over a period 5 years.
Overall, it is clear that the US is the country sent most money in technology. Also, the trend donated money was increased throughout the period shown.
In 2006, US sent nearly 10 billion dollars in technical development. This number continuously increased until reached at 22,7 billion dollars in 2010. The money invested in technology by activating charities in EU had a little amount. They started around 2,7 billion dollars and after 5 years, this amount went up into 4 billion dollars .
However, the money was given in technology by charities in other countries quite low. And this amount gradual fluctuated by time, started 2,7 and ended with 3 billion dollars, compared with the total amount had the same trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 61
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 73
- The chart below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 56
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment. This number continuously increased until reached at 22,7 billion dollars in...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is amount went up into 4 billion dollars . However, the money was given in techno...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the total amount had the same trend.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92715231788 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63680402326 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.903900478 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358418420622 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147215803295 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117693357066 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215956804128 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834132841254 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.