The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between
1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the trends in birth rates of China and the USA over an 80-year period between 1920 and 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that both China and USA had the same trend over the period given. During the first 33 years, it fluctuated dramatically then shown a steady fall. Another interesting point is that the rate of birth in USA was higher than China’s generally.
Looking at the details, just as USA, China started with 10 percent in but in 1933 it reached 15 percent exceeded USA (13%) at that time. However, in the next 20 years the figure of both China and USA shown a plunge, hit a trough at 5 percent from 1941 to 1943. Then the rate of birth grew sharply, finishing at 20 percent and 15 percent respectively in 1947.
By contrast, over the last period there was a big gap between the birth rates of USA and China. The figures for them dipped stably finishing the period at 7 percent and 3 percent in turn.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 67
- Consumption of Spreads 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 89
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46590909091 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3229674311 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.1107279648 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186104558522 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091782029377 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069173837798 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138922396067 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504806069888 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.