moving from rural areas to big cities
The history of human migration can date back to prehistoric times when massive human movements took place globally in search of a better living environment with fertile land. This human instinct in seeking for betterment, in fact, is still a crucial driving force to prompt a growing number of young migrants from the countryside to cities for education and work.
Resulting from imbalanced social development in multiple aspects, the geographical differences in life quality are the major triggers. Less likely to be a regional economic or political center to attract large cooperation’s investments, most rural or remote areas may not be able to show their competitive advantages in the provision of sufficient job opportunities, let alone with the rewarding position with competitive compensation and benefits packages. As a result, despite the fierce competition in the local labour market, many metropolises thank to their prosperity, are attractive to fresh graduates in terms of higher incomes and more promising career paths with substantial work experience accumulated from famous companies. Meanwhile, benefiting from the stronger economy, urban infrastructure, including the education system, tends to be better developed, with more funding on teaching facilities and competitive incentives to experienced faculty.
In general, such a trend brings more merits to young individuals. Even though they are likely to encounter a series of life pressure from either their work or study due to the fierce competition in the urban area, the returns, as mentioned before, are evident. Otherwise, they would not have been tempted to leave their hometown. The side-effect of this phenomenon to both rural and urban areas, however, might be more worrying than what society can benefit from. From a macro perspective, the entire human resource of society might have been better utilized. Yet, the beneficiary is the big cities only. Losing a young and competent workforce is the most frequent loss to the farming industry and thus, the local economic progress is stagnant so that the gap between these two areas might be further widened. Besides, the uneven population distribution may lead to other human-resource-related problems. The soaring property price originating from the joint-effect between the limited urban space and raising accommodation demands is one of many typical examples.
In conclusion, the occurrence of this tren is mainly attributed to the greater chances, as well as, the possibly improved living standard accordingly. Be that as it may, the adverse impacts of the disequilibrium in the population distribution between rural and urban areas on society as a whole might be significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | thu12 | view | |
| 2022-01-18 | yamchips | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | thaoxinhdep | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | hin07 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 87
- In many countries today, people in cities live alone or in small family units, rather than family groups. 84
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthlycontract for four different mobile (cell phones) in aEuropean country from January to September 2002,measured in euro. 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one twon who rode bicycles in 2011 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...en tempted to leave their hometown. The side-effect of this phenomenon to both rural and ur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2298.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51079136691 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13495210659 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592326139089 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6651799262 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.176470588 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201250218798 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059492199046 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562739140292 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107698603393 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480210598328 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 78.4519038076 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.