Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Most of the countries accepted that Basic Education is important and primary education is the compulsory for everyone. University education fuels the students to profession in their career. Only the subjects what we learned from universities are useful for the future. I personally agree with the viewpoint that we should allowed to study the subjects related with science and technology in the future.
The supporters of the view that arty subjects should include in higher education after a number of points to justify their opinion. The educated person should know basic of everything. They believed that a graduated can speak/ discuss with business men, but business men cannot participate in educated tables. And also, the art subjects can make a person to gentle and less aggressive.
However, the opponents of the above idea have their respective reasons as well. Firstly, teaching all kind of subjects is wasting the students’ time and energy. Students should be more emphasis on the subjects what are important for their future. The knowledge gained from primary education is enough and if the people want to study art subjects continue, they can be learned after got degree based on the basic knowledge.
Secondly, if the human resources is fewer in the productivity field than entertainment sector, it can effect country’s economic. Thus, we should encourage the youth to study more the subjects what can raise country income.
To sum up, university education is concerning with the nation and the curriculum is the fake of citizens. Therefore, useful subjects are the only should be included in advanced education.
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 56
- the diagrams show how the bee makes honey, and the stages in the production of honey. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'studying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: studying
...th the viewpoint that we should allowed to study the subjects related with science and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ncome. To sum up, university education is concerning with the nation and the curriculum is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ning with the nation and the curriculum is the fake of citizens. Therefore, useful...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be included in advanced education.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29501915709 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79696110836 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536398467433 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9080668071 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290491948219 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953144574784 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757995678883 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160131711982 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534576474372 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.