The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people
The statement above comes from the perspective whether the greatness of the nation can be measured by welfare of all its people, or its surest proof is the success of its rulers, artists or scientists. There is no doubt that the greatness of the country invariably depends on the cumulative welfare of its people. This is a broad concept which includes many aspects of life such as freedom, human rights, physical well-being, public safety, social and economical equivalence, economic growth, equal opportunity non-discrimination, science and arts. cultural heritage. History of mankind is witness to the fact that the accomplishments of the leaders, artists and scientists ensure well-being of their nation’s people and thus, contribute to the greatness of the nation.
To begin, the history proves that the welfare of the people in the terms of liberty, human rights, public safety, non-discrimination has always been improved by the achievements of the national leaders. For example, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, with Emancipation Proclamation abolished slavery in the US which freed 3,5 million enslaved African Americans. This was a contribution of crucial importance for the well-being of the African Americans in the US. Furthermore, Lincoln’s other achievements are strengthening the federal government, saving the Union and modernizing the economy which helped enormously to the progress of the country. Among the other leaders who fighted for liberty was certainly Gandhi, the Father of the Indian nation and one of the most important leaders in the history of humanity. Gandhi was first leader who introduced, firstly in South Africa, as a lawyer of the Indian minority, and later in India, a non-violent civil disobedience. Gandhi’s greatest importance is in ending the British rule in India. Bringing the Independence to Indian people he improved the quality of their lives like no other leader before. Introducing non-violent civil disobedience, Gandhi inspired many leaders in the world such as Nelson Mandela in South Africa and Martin Luther King in the USA. Nelson Mandela dedicated his life for the fight against apartheid in South Africa. With the help of De Klerk who liberated him from 27 years of prison and, who helped him in the fight in ending the apartheid, Mandela finally, in 1994 ended the apartheid. End of the apartheid meant the end of the rule of the white race and discrimination the black, mulate and Indian people. Nelson Mandela was the first of the country elected by completely democratic election. The second example of leader who followed Gandhi’s non-violent civil disobedience principe was Martin Luther King. He fighted for the anti-discrimination of the African Americans. All these examples of the successful leaders show for the welfare of nation’s people it is pivotal to have the leader who will fight for their liberty and human rights and, in this way, improve their welfare.
Further, the greatness of the country today is measured by the social and economic equivalence of its people, public safety, physical well-being and economic growth. In these terms, President Roosevelt improved greatly the economic well-being of the American nation, by implementing New Deal programs and projects in the time of Great Depression in the US with which started the capitalism. For today’s greatest countries are considered Nordic countries, which means Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Greenland. These countries follow a Nordic model which implies social and economic developmental policies. They have a low level of corruption and people have trust in politicians and police. Other example is Canada, where Prime Minister Harper, in the time of recession employed economic policies and promoted business in healthy way. This method made the citizens of Canada to not feel impact of the recession which influenced all the world. Third example of great country is clearly, Switzerland where welfare system is very strong. They have policies for high pensions for retired people with long nursing help.
In conclusion, some argue that welfare of the nation’s people is independent from the leaders, artists and scientist achievements. However, there are numerous examples in the past of the these leaders who helped in progress of their countries, that it is impossible to support this recommendation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people 66
- The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining thewell-being of that country’s citizens. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cultural
...y non-discrimination, science and arts. cultural heritage. History of mankind is witness...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is method made the citizens of Canada to not feel impact of the recession which i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3742.0 2235.4752809 167% => OK
No of words: 687.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44687045124 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11963717896 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02851642138 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 325.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4730713246 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1147.5 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.366161247 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.709677419 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1612903226 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45161290323 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180076917896 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455016480728 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800562057894 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13645781047 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104785921362 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 194.0 100.480337079 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.