Human history is very ancient and it is still continuing. Form stone age to now, people used to live in dark caves and lived on hunting, by contrast, now we can build our home personally, producing a profusion of food by cultivating plants, fishing, and breeding animals. Therefore, we can discover that there is a huge difference between now and ancient time. So, there is some people think that all university students required to take history courses no matter what field they specialize in and others think that taking history class is not necessary at all. In my opinion, I am in favor of the statement that scholars should not take the history class. The followings are my explanations.
To begin with, pupils can save a significant time without taking history courses. That is to say that people can utilize those time focusing on their own study. For example, in my country, history class takes five hours a week at least or even longer, if students can take advantage of those time to do more research, they can have more job done in the same time and acquire a bunch of accomplishments or they can do all the things they like such as doing leisure activities to relax pressure and doing exercise to improve their body strength. So, it is obvious that if students do not have to take history class, they can have more time to do various things.
Secondly, takings history class is sometimes a torture. To be more specific, not every people are interested in history class and there are some students thinking it is very boring. A typical example is that my friend, john, falls asleep on history class all the time. The reason he hates history class is that he has poor ability to memorize so he always performs very bad in tests, however, the only way to get good grades in history class is to remember all the details that happened in the past. Obviously, for people who have the bad capability of memorizing, history class is a challenge difficulty.
There is no denying that taking history class benefits modern society. What I want to say is that people can learn from the past mistakes and prevent from happenings again. Taking world war two for example, the united states throw two atomic bombs in japan, leading to massive destruction and radiation which will cause body problem such as genetic mutation. In order to avoid such a miserable things happening again, the un enact a law to limit the use of nuclear weapons. But, with the development of modern technology, scientists can simulate the consequence of all the behaviors. So there is no necessary to taking history class to learn from the past.
To sum up, due to above mention reasons, which can correlate with each other and generate a whole new one and become more convincing than every single one of them, therefore we can comfortable to say that there is no need to take history courses since students can save more time, learn all the consequence by modern technology and avoid from encountering troubles.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Schools always collect information about teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful？ 1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students. 2. to evaluate teachers' performance by 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 64
- TPO 41- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doi 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2479.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 521.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75815738964 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54336652386 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500959692898 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.0907276355 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.681818182 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6818181818 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22783739149 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748310136843 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634237384707 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129528126088 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042128133319 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.