Disposing waste on streets has become a common problem in many countries these days. What are the causes and solutions for this issue?
Without a doubt, the prevalence of dumping waste on roads has risen alarmingly in many regions of the world. A plethora of countries have reported that because of a lack of considerations about town cleanliness and lack of arrangements for dumping garbage, people casually throw their rubbish on the streets. There are a number of solutions that can be implemented to deal with this such as public awareness and imposing heaving fine on polluters.
Lack of responsibility in locals about cleanliness of their own surroundings most likely begets several health issues. It is because some people have not been taught that its also their responsibility to keep the town clean. To exemplify, in India people usually throw garbage here and there without caring that eventually it will attract flies and mosquitos and will transmit dreadful diseases such as malaria and viral. To tackle this issue, aggressive sensitisation campaigns on disposing of waste should be implemented by the local regime.
Another reason for this common issue is that there are no proper arrangements to dump the garbage. It has been suggested by many people that in some countries the government has no focus on providing facilities to dump their daily garbage. For an instance, many people could not find an appropriate place to throw their waste, which results, throwing waste on roads finds them more convenient. To break this old stereotype, government must designate adequate dumping sites and also announce a garbage day once in a week in every area when people will get free waste pickup service. This problem could also be mitigated if the government impose heavy fine on polluters if they find any.
To conclude, lack of awareness and insufficient arrangements enforces many citizens to throw the waste on streets. However, these issues can be handled if the government take appropriate actions in terms of awareness programmes and provision of dumping grounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-02 | Tarunsuri020 | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 84
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Is it advantageous or disadvantageous? 73
- Nowadays, young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls. Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in 73
- Disposing waste on streets has become a common problem in many countries these days. What are the causes and solutions for this issue? 73
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but other claim that animals are a necessary part of diet. What’s your opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be implemented by the local regime. Another reason for this common issue is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21656050955 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83854987808 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544585987261 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6530921647 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189279566931 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662458339605 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461011507442 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11057994301 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433833336737 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.