The charts below show the result of a long-term survey carried out by an environmental group into local wildlife population figures.
The main reasons of why the population changes from 2000 to current is presented in the pie chart while the bar graph shows the proportion change in wildlife’s population.
The population of insects have increased just under 40%, and this is caused by the habitat destruction (43%). Pollution is another significant reason of the changing of wildlife population (21%) while the other figures experience less than a fifth as to influence such population changing. These factors can cause the population of freshwater fish, birds, and reptiles have decreased.
A more details look at the charts, show that a decrease of more 26% fish population has lived in freshwater is caused by the overexploitation, and this also decrease the rate of birds at under one in ten per cent. Surprisingly, the population of either mammals or aquatic mammals have increased while the other figures have declined.
Overall, the significant reason of why wildlife population changes is the habitat destruction. This has caused the number of freshwater fish and insects population witness a marked fall.
- These graphs show the result of a survey. 100 people (single men and women and couples with/without children) were interviewed to find out who they typically spend time with on a free day. The percentages shown here are averages.Summarise the information 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 93
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
- The pictures below show the changes that took place at Laguna Beach from 1950 to 1990 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pie chart while the bar graph shows the proportion change in wildlife's...
^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the proportion change in wildlife's population. The population of insects...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32947976879 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03284833118 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7616953991 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125648655485 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607488390639 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302781466904 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872999560616 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220850967456 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.