Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of spending time at work and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a private life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, modern life can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, having time for personal activities might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the working life of individuals far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only, do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcome, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
- some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? discuss your views. 88
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money. 89
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. 88
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65573770492 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22276069683 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688524590164 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8361678579 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122936127709 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446011854848 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700375338222 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689871664536 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423472808665 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.