Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
An increasing number of people meet and talk to their friends online instead of in person. I would argue that this tendency is negative because of some reasons.
The first clear reason is that socialize online leads to social isolation. People concentrate on building relationships using social media confining their time alone at home in their room without meeting other and often this has resulted in social isolation. For example, it might be terrible that one is ostracized, discrimination and unfairly judged by everyone.
Another issue is that meeting people online can be risky. Many individuals tend to use fake identities online as well as hid their real personality. As a rule, they could be swindled and easily leaded to dangerous situations.
In conclusion, communicating on social networks is becoming more common in society, and I believe this is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-19 | Armandeep Kaur | 80 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | Armandeep Kaur | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050. 67
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.Sports ----- boys 6-11---- boys 12-16football 87 78basketball 35 25cricket 45 34rugby 23 21swimming 19 19 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
- Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 1615.20841683 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 142.0 315.596192385 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2676056338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 4.20363070211 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92832448828 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 506.74238477 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.41733409 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1111111111 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141999476868 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592967012486 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415716573636 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944745141694 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332334914256 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.