Cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain.

Essay topics:

Cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain.

The line graph compares the percentages of cinema-going people in 4 different age groups in Great Britain between 1984 and 2000.

It is clear that the rate of people attending cinema in 15-24 age group was by far highest during the period research. Additionally, the figures for other groups also experienced significant increases.

In 1984, 15 to 24-year-old attendees going to the cinema was highest, around 18%, while the figure of people aged 7-14 made up only 10%. Meanwhile, the proportion of cinema-goers in 25 and over visiting cinema made up nearly 5%, compared to just about 2% of cinema attendees who were 35 and over.

In 2000, there was a dramatic increase in 15-24 age group of cinema-attendees to approximately 55% and remained the highest point, whereas the figure for people aged 35 and over rose gradually to around 15%. At the same time, there was a gradual rise in the percentages of the remaining two groups rose to 30%, which was at the same level.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 Zahid6400 56 view
2024-07-09 Sajib Ahamed 84 view
2024-03-20 MinyiChu 70 view
2024-03-20 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-12-04 vuongthaolinh 84 view
Essays by user IVANTRUONG :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tendees going to the cinema was highest, around 18%, while the figure of people a...
^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of cinema-goers in 25 and over visiting cinema made up nearly 5%, compared to ju...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88023952096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81471522933 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7159999589 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361234375555 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171039787661 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111694893079 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238784258584 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935983112605 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.