Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is clear that technology has an influence on our communication. Technology effect relationships in many ways. I believe that technology has both advantages and disadvantages.
Technology has an impact on the relationship in social, education, business. As technology is developing, people can interact without meeting through some application, such as Facebook, Instagram,…. In addition, with learning through computers, students are able to take courses and attain a degree online from a distance, which provides a chance for children all over the world. As a typical example of this is students can easily for taking video lessons on the internet with a teacher in a different country.
There are several benefits of the developments for us. Firstly, the relationship seems to be reinforced by keeping contact with old friends, co-workers, … Interaction by email is likely to reduce the limitation of written letters. Secondly, the new development helped companies to save time and money. Cooperation between people in different countries was much easier when they have a capacity of contacting without calling a meeting or a requiring print of the materials.
On the other hand, the developments bring some disadvantage to our lives. It is clear that technology seems to isolate people and disadvantage real interaction. For example, children who use the internet tend to make friends online rather mixing with their peer. In addition, schoolchildren pay more attention to playing games and chatting online instead of reading. They may not enough time to use their imagination to read and thinking deeply in materials, which might lead them to lack of social and soft skills.
In conclusion, I believe that technology has an important role in the development of countries but also has negative outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals, during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this opinion? 61
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...application, such as Facebook, Instagram,…. In addition, with learning through com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38596491228 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14051749043 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8363749318 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2941176471 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19841288858 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616101424868 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407028155589 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104740213709 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119185045791 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.