Tpo- 39-1
The reading claims three reasons which are culprit of a mass-extinction of more than half of all living organisms. While the professor believes that the mentioned reasons are unconvincing and rejects them.
Firstly, the reading asserts that declining of sea levels is a theory about this exticion. While, the professor elucidates that although the scientists prove that the increasing the see level can damage the shallow and coastal species, but this extinction is about all species such as deep species. Furthermore, the decreasing the see level take million years which species can adopt themselves, while this mass-extinction was suddenly. therefore, the declining of see level which is occurred gradually was not blamed for sudden mass-extinction.
Secondly, the second passages' theory is related to massive cooling which the professor introduces that S02 after a short time when combined with the rain come back to the earth and after that the atmosphere is clean. Hence, the So2 which is realized to atmosphere by volcanic activity do not remained for a long time to create climate Colling.
Eventually, the third theory involves an asteroid strike, however the professor claims that any asteroid strike has not been found which can be adapted with the date of mass-extinction. Though, the recent discovery is associated with 12 million years before mass-extinction.
- Essay topics: TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-37-2Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- T P O 34-2 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...more, the decreasing the see level take million years which species can adopt themselve...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...hile this mass-extinction was suddenly. therefore, the declining of see level which is oc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
... mass-extinction. Secondly, the second passages theory is related to massive cooling wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...apted with the date of mass-extinction. Though, the recent discovery is associated wit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41395348837 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97781230837 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6335715982 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.