The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries
The table compares the average expenditure of college pupils among 3 different countries namely A, B and C.
Overall, the amount of money which country A’s young people spent accounted for the largest part in total spending among 3 countries. In addition, students in all countries spent the highest proportion of their budget for accommodation and food.
In term of accommodation, the percentage of an average yearly expenses of young people in country A was highest, at 45%; followed by that in country B and C, at 35% and 3% respectively. By contrast, students in country C spent more in food, which accounted 36% in total spending. The figures for country A and B were 22% and 28% respectively. There was the similar proportion of spending in leisure between A and B, at 22% and 28%; where as the figure for C was lower considerably; just 12%. 21% of total spending of university students in country C was for books, compared to 9% of A and 3% of B. Students in all countries spent lowest proportion on others, which accounted for 8%, 5% and 1% of their yearly expenses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-28 | kh12 | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | kh12 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | kh12 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Nguyễn Thị Hường | 11 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | Vuong Linh | 91 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 61
- some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that what children watch on television will influence their behaviours. Others think that the time they watch television influences their behaviour most. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 84
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries 61
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 different countries namely A, B and C. Overall, the amount of money which count...
^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...eisure between A and B, at 22% and 28%; where as the figure for C was lower considerably...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the lowest'.
Suggestion: spent the lowest
... and 3% of B. Students in all countries spent lowest proportion on others, which accounted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73544973545 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93077757294 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.14539612 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224613062593 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110930232679 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644042728605 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172117680282 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474868664024 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.