Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are different opinions on whether or not teachers were respected more in the past than nowadays. As with everything, there are always two sides to every question. Some people hold the opinion that teachers have had more authoritative presence in the past than today. Others, of course, strongly disagree that educators had more value in the past. Today they are more appreciated than decades ago. I, myself agree with the former because I believe that teachers were valued by society in different level of degree than they are today.
To begin with, in the past teachers were classified in the category of elites. Their power of teaching was outstanding because the system was organised in a different way than it is today. Back in the day, teachers were those people who had to evaluate and decide which students would continue further education, based on their performance during the academic year. Today, teachers do not do that. Students, just have to pas those standard exams and if they fulfill the requirements then they are good to continue their education. Because of this, the educational system has replaced the power of teachers.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that being a teacher, decades ago was very hard, the pathway that students had to go was not that easy. To become a professor in those days, students had to be excellent in school and a well-rounded people. To illustrate this, take my father's experience. He was a very talented teacher. When he decided to become a professor he knew that the path that he had to follow it was not going to be easy. But, because he loved to teach, he did not think about it. My father did his best on his preparation. Therefore, he was successful in his profession. I remember, when his students talked about his natural skill of teaching, and how much they appreciated his help.
That is why, I think that it is important to appreciate the hard work of our teachers.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers were valued more in the past than they are today because their path was harder and their power of teaching was higher than it is today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremost 73
- TPO 19 Integrated writing task 33
- The author states the reasons that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter- argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremost, the writer mentions that the in 78
- Friends are very important part of our lives Some people believe that having a friendship with a small number of people is more reliable While others argue that it is more important to make many new friends easily Personally I think that having a long fri 70
- There is a drastic contrast between different types of people on whether people perform well when they do one task at a time or doing multi tasks and perform bad. While, it is contradicted by many that people people could be able to do different things bu 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...anding because the system was organised in a different way than it is today. Back in the day, teac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...rs were those people who have to decide whos student would continue further educati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people who have to decide whos student would continue further education, based ...
^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'entitled'.
Suggestion: entitled
...e academic year. Today teachers are not entitle to do that. Students, just have to pas ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Because
...good to go further with their education.Because of this, the system is the one that wou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rience. He was a very talented teacher. When he decided to become a professor he kne...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to be easy. But, because he loved to become one, he did not think about it. M...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, as to, i think, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77513227513 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58656166046 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484126984127 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1008517752 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9523809524 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244744084637 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849532715166 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848640575643 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141708119559 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115687343312 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.