Comparison of energy production
The pie charts above illustrate several types of energy produced in france in the years 1995 and 2005. Units are measured in percent.
Overall, in both years, coal and gas were the main sources of energy, while nuclear and other types of energy were the least popular in france. Throughout the given period, the production of gas and coal almost remained the same. In contrast, petro, nuclear, and other forms of energy source productions somewhat varied.
In 1995, the majority of energy production came from coal and gas: the numbers were 29.80% and 29.63%, respectively. over ten years, these figures grew nearly by 1%. By 2005, 30.31% of total energy production was from gas and 30.93% was from coal.
energy produced from petro saw a significant fall from 29.27% to 19.55%. On the other hand, over the ten year period, the remaining energy sources such as nuclear and other kinds experienced a increase of about 4% reaching 10.10% and 9.10%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The Diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 73
- Some people think that children's free time must include educational activities otherwise they will waste their time.What is your opinion? 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as clothes, foods and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe it is important 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...s were 29.80% and 29.63%, respectively. over ten years, these figures grew nearly by...
^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Energy
... gas and 30.93% was from coal. energy produced from petro saw a significant f...
^^^^^^
Line 16, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... as nuclear and other kinds experienced a increase of about 4% reaching 10.10% an...
^
Line 16, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaching 10.10% and 9.10%, respectively.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4260522907 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8014353821 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244905704755 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100300454271 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719939940079 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145782445622 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055299144305 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.