Advertising encourages customers to buy quantity, not in quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Advertising encourages customers to buy quantity, not in quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's world, the advertisement has become a significant tool for marketing a product. So it leads to the question about its function. Although some people claim that it helps improve product quality, I personally believe that it more encourages sales volume.
There are many essential and related reasons why advertising could cause several disadvantages for customers. Firstly, advertising campaigns could include marketing strategy such as "the second one free," which mean customers can have two items together at a lower price than purchasing each item separately. One such example is the Lux company which agree to give soap free on purchase of two soaps. It obviously encourages customers to buy more. Secondly, the fact shows that the more advertising expenses increase, the higher the product price is. The reason can be that the selling price of advertised items covers the high cost of advertisements. As a result, the advertised product can cost more than they should, and customers must pay for extra-cost.
Another disadvantage of advertisements is that customers are cognitively and psychologically defenseless against advertising. Therefore, they are easily influenced by some costly branded but unnecessary items, especially children. Advertisements encourage children to entice their parents to purchase the product advertised in the commercial. Nowadays, most of the children like to own a smartphone which is a result of the mass advertisement. Recently a school in the United Kingdom banned children from using smartphone inside school premises, as cellphones were the major cause of distraction which affected their studies.
In conclusion, I believe that advertisements create an impression on the customer's mind and people end up buying unnecessary items. Thus, advertising is more conducive to increasing quantity rather than enhancing quality.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 sepide1367 73 view
2020-01-29 martinestefan 73 view
2020-01-29 kiana 61 view
2020-01-29 Niusha 56 view
2020-01-29 lydunhien 61 view
Essays by user minhumm :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68085106383 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20422988885 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5503337075 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208136827231 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655999493868 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068178444909 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135151943559 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600045072852 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.