The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 2000 to 2012.
The line graph compares the number of hours taken to produce a car by three companies throughout the period from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, the amount of time spent on the production of a car increased slightly between 2000 to 2012. There was a wide fluctuation in the time to make a car from Ford over the period.
In 2000, Toyota took almost 17 hours to produce a vehicle, compared with 28 hours spent by Ford. Honda was able to manufacture a car in about 32 hours. While the production time generally rose in the following years, the figures fluctuated. For example, in 2004, Ford spent nearly 11 hours on the production of a vehicle.
There was a slightly increased in the manufacturing time per car for Honda and Toyota in 2012. The figure for the production time of Toyota was about 18 hours. The number of hours taken to manufacture a vehicle by Honda was about 33 hours. However, in the case of Ford, the year 2012 saw a significant rose in the production time, at about 40 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | minhumm | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | quanganh3110 | 78 | view |
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? 20
- Advertising encourages customers to buy quantity, not in quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think the government should pay for health care and education, but there is no agreement about whether it is the government's responsibility. What is your opinion? 67
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but there is no agreement about whether it is the government s responsibility What is your opinion 77
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give you own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49444444444 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56550599057 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2555669744 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5454545455 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288378613298 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123769910321 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927847233204 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212720153132 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874709189359 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.