The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The given bar chart illustrates percentage of families living in owned properties and those living in rented ones in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
It is articulate from the information supplied that percentage rates of families in fare accommodation experienced a weighty decrease while there was an increase in the percentage rate of those owning their personal houses.
Amplifying from a little over 20 percent in 1981 and doubling to 50 percent in 1971, the major proportion of families that owned their lodging continually rose to nearly 70 percent in 2001, before dropping to almost 64 percent in 2001. In opposition with the steady growth of families who owned their dwellings, those who rented, at the start-up of the period, represented majority in the highest figure of about 78 percent in 1918. In spite of, this proportion brought a sustained decline to a low of just above 30 percent in 2001.
Moreover, the following two years remind at 69 percent. After that, it saw sudden fall in the percentage to somewhere in the near of 31 percent in 2001, and the percentage in 2011 reached about 35 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Jay297 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the year 1990, 2000 and 2010. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91052631579 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73593608485 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7003345316 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189119958516 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914134159633 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109213178888 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144632498035 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114092525113 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.