Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
People have different views about the role of online information and the traditional libraries in students’ studying. While I agree with the view that accessing online sources of information has become more easily than in the past, I would argue that the libraries would not be replaced.
Admittedly, accessing information online has several clear benefits. The Internet is an endless source of information which can supply almost any aspect of studying. For example, modern technologies such as mobile phones or laptops have functions that enable students to search for the most effective studying methods which help enlarge their knowledge quickly, from social subjects to science ones, higher-education and detailed syllabus. In addition, online study allows students set their own study time. This might be explained by the fact that while most libraries can only be visited during several hours per day, online study offers students greater flexibility and enable them to creat a timetable in line with their needs and characteristics. Therefore, it is likely that they communicate with teachers and other students more easily than ever thanks to the proliferation of the Internet.
However, the traditional libraries is important considering its effect on studying. Firstly, the physical libraries offer public buildings where teachers and students can have face-to-face interactions. By meeting together, exchanging knowledge and discussing assignments with teachers and other students, they can generate ideas in doing research and avoid misunderstanding. Secondly, libraries are dedicated space for studying in which students are able to escape the distractions which caused by Facebook notifications or entertainment websites while searching materials on the Internet. This would help them increase their concentration to finish their work with greater productivity.
In conclusion, although I accept that accessing information online brings advantages in several ways, I believe that improving and investing more in the traditional libraries is of great educational value.
- Although it is generally prohibited corporal punishment persists in many families Do you think corporal punishment is an acceptable way to regulate children s bahaviours 80
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is advantageous to learn their cultures and traditions. How do you think people can learn other cultures and traditions? Why do you think that some people are interested in learning those tradition 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Discuss the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness? 84
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'supply'
Suggestion: supply
...endless source of information which can supplies almost any aspect of studying. For exam...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85294117647 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11208071067 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.325890182 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.928571429 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184944094461 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688641916758 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374105588332 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12235704322 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313988768089 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.