As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that whether businesses should not only focus on generating profits, but also have social obligation is still a matter of controversy. While I accept with the view that increasing profits is the top priority of businesses, I believe that they should consider their social standing in community.
In terms of economic aspect, it is apparent that maximizing profits need to be primary objective in order for any business to survive in an increasingly competitive market. By making a profit, companies are able to cover their overhead costs, such as employees’s wages and payments for buildings and utilities. There have been numerous companies which face challenge of going out business within the first five years since they have failed to produce improved profits to pay for their running costs. In addition, a profitable business would allow owners to grow their business in order to meet the changing needs of customers. For instance, by investing more in innovations and market research, not only can they remain successful, but also improve their business performance. Consequently, both customers and investors would be more attracted by their thriving.
From the perspective of social value, corporations should also consider a range of responsibilities which would help enhance their public image. Firstly, their own employees should be treated well with a “living wage” and standards of health and safety in the workplace to ensure that workers could have a good quality of life. This would increase their levels of happiness and feelings of job satisfaction, which could be seen as a motivator to boost the company’s development. Secondly, it is essential that businesses should use a proportion of their profit to support the local in order to achieve sustainable development goals. For example, their participation in local charities or environmental projects will be of great benefit to society. Finally, with transparency, companies can pay more taxes for the government through the tax system. This money can help the authorities allocate financial resource to important fields such as education and health care services, which will improve standards of living as a whole.
In conclusion, although I accept that companies need to prioritize their profitable growth, I believe that they should take actions for social objectives.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-30 | evie | 56 | view |
2019-11-18 | Hanana | 84 | view |
2019-11-10 | lalleNATA | 73 | view |
2019-11-08 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
2019-10-29 | Krushnagopal | 84 | view |
- In some cultures the old age is highly valued while in some cultures youth is highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 84
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fashion trend is difficult to follow these days, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n employees should be treated well with a 'living wage' and standards o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44054054054 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04443474347 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564864864865 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8362158362 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.8125 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122865124864 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447811424882 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404819554512 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821288048757 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035295396247 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.