It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view
It is no doubt that the rise of advanced technology goes hand in hand with the elimination of traditional culture have drawn a mounting concern in the society. In my perspective, I partly agree with this point of view and buy into the idea that this assumption is not accurate in some circumstances.
On the one hand, there is no wonder that the ground shaking development of modern technology have involved in the substitution of human lifestyle. Since modern technology such as social network, electronic mail and so on came about, it have directly affect the way people communicate and behave which brings about alteration in culture. With the rise of technology, new cultural habits are from another hemisphere are imported in a nation, in this sense, the old-fashioned cultures are removed. For instance, the taste in fashion of teenagers in Vietnam is influenced by Korean or Western countries which does not appropriate to the weather, replace the traditional way which is reserve and sophisticated.
On the other hand, technology is not completely incompatible to culture, by contrast, it advocates and give rises to culture. In this case, some countries in Africa have put modern technology and equipment in agriculture, for instance,pesticide plane or watering system, which lead to the increase in profit and improve the economic. It is sensible to say that technology is a key elements contributing to the national prosperous. In addition, without technology, particularly Internet, by no means traditional culture can be widespread and carry on in a country when time passing by, furthermore, it is a mean to introduce valuable culture to the world.
In conclusion, technology is a two-edge sword, however, if it is exploited logically, it will be an essential contributor not only to individual but also to a national culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reason for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 92
- In some countries, small town-center shops atr going out o business because peope tenf to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores and this may result in the use of cars.Do you think the 84
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language . Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sen to prison commit crime when set free. What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...lectronic mail and so on came about, it have directly affect the way people communic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , pesticide
...d equipment in agriculture, for instance,pesticide plane or watering system, which lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'element'?
Suggestion: element
...ensible to say that technology is a key elements contributing to the national prosperous...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20134228188 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22303513749 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.3374161483 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.909090909 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289041676681 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988073227938 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505094014267 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173191249758 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540951121392 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.