Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the exposure problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be preferential and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue whether government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today or try to solve the anticipated problems of the future is a contentious one. I believe government should put more emphasis on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future rather than solving the immediate problems of the today because it will make the country/world better for future generation. Moreover, some serious problems require long planning which can't be solved immediately.
People go to work everyday for providing food, shelter, education, better health care and other necessities to the family. They work hard because they believe if they work hard today they will be able to provide a better future for the family and for himself. Likewise, government should focus more on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future since it will ensure better health care, better transport system, better education system and better economy for the future generation.
Moreover, some problems can't be solved immediately. For example, the people of Dhaka are suffering from traffic jam everyday. For solving this problem, the government has taken the project of metro rail which will make the traffic condition of Dhaka worse. It may seem like more suffering for the people right now, but after two years the people of Dhaka will have an excellent traffic system. Same things can be said for population problem, housing problem and economy problem. So it takes time to solve far more important problems whether we like it or not.
Some may argue that focusing on immediate problems will make life better today. But the argument is flawed because if we think of today, we may never get metro rail. Consequently, we may have to deal with traffic jam for rest of our life along with our future generation.
Though it may seem lucrative to work on immediate problems of today rather than focusing on anticipated future problems, government should always try to focus on the anticipated future problems to shape a better future for our future generation. For these reasons, I believe government should put more emphasis on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future rather than solving the immediate problems of the today
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | fa1salahm3d | 50 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 58
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the exposure problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain you 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...us problems require long planning which cant be solved immediately. People go to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...olved immediately. People go to work everyday for providing food, shelter, education,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... generation. Moreover, some problems cant be solved immediately. For example, the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...of Dhaka are suffering from traffic jam everyday. For solving this problem, the governme...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... whether we like it or not. Some may argue that focusing on immediate problems wil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11716621253 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59270283049 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405994550409 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3295731199 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.470588235 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279751546608 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125413891894 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106351647947 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19381145421 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115082610568 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.