The given diagram illustrates how many people under 1000 people, who have smoked, are in Someland over four decades up to 2000.
Overall, there was a contraction in here, the number of smoker of male went down significantly while those of female had two clear stages with one of dramatical increase between 1960 and 1975, and one of gradual decline in the last 25 years.
In 1960 registered 600 men in 1000 people both two sex by contract, this number was only approximate 100 women. Over 25 years, there was a commendable signal, the rate of smoking gentles witnessed a slight drop by 100. However, those of lady saw a sharp climb with a threefold.
The figure of smoking male continued to decrease by half over the following 25-years period. Moreover, at the same time, the female seemed to have some change therefore, the people in this sex fell to its lowest level. By 2000, in per 1000 people, there were 250 men and 200 women using tobacco.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- The pie chart shows information about water resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada. 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 41
- some cities are growing large, what are the reasons and consequences 56
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...r, those of lady saw a sharp climb with a threefold. The figure of smoking male continued ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42459992726 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8218100803 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201339401228 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784760662527 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562905208639 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113101578219 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511607901404 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.