Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Every institute thrives on the success of its students and how they are nurtured and encouraged in honing their skills. Teachers are a very important part in the education system to create the environment where every individual student can prosper and feel accommodated. To remunerate the faculties as per the academic performance of students, is going to have a worse effect than doing any good to the students. For vocational institutes where the performance in attaining the end skillset to work may be very important, this kind of structure may give a somewhat boost to the already skilled ones or with the knack in them. But this will draw it's negative side when the teachers try gathering students, who are comparatively better in academic performance than it's application.
Formal education in the colleges or universities where the focus is on attaining greater academic achievement, students are usually already focused on what they want to learn and what they want to acheive in their field of study. But it's not just the theoritical aspect of academics that are taught in the institutes. How about the applied sciences or literature or art? The skill in implementing the knowledge is more important than getting more marks in the exams. If teachers are paid based on the performance of their students, it'll draw more attention to the students who are better in mugging up the book and get better scores in papers. The important thing we need to make note here is that just getting better marks are not the criteria of success in life, rather the implementation of the knowledge one gains in the institutes. The application of knowledge and skills are more important in preparing a student in the real life as well as in their work. Not to mention that, such promotion would make the education system a bad place for the nascent minds who are constantly seeking new things to learn and trying new artistic endeavor.
Another problem this salary criteria will cause, is that teachers will start fighting for students that are better in academic performance and ignore the ones who are better in real application. So the whole education system will be skewed towards the high marks getters. Vocational training is one consideration where such a structure might give some benefit to tha students, where the end goal of such a course is to get the students better prepared for the upcoming job. But the allocation of students has to be governed by a body of faculties who can ditribute students in classes without being biased at their present skillset or academics. The goal needs to be overall better performance by all students than only a certain group of students under certain teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | bashirheidari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 58
- Claim: Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace asubstantial amount of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and universitycourses.Reason: It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 83
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 50
- Young minds should be guided to achieve worthy goals, as goals are inherently selfish. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 555, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somewhat') instead an adjective, or a noun ('boost') instead of another adjective.
...ortant, this kind of structure may give a somewhat boost to the already skilled ones or with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earn and trying new artistic endeavor. Another problem this salary criteria wil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, as to, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94065934066 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75625426402 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468131868132 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8356085932 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191563567014 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622690835033 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495252207439 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138096969997 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354065874325 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.